Introduction
In today’s always-on world, downtime isn’t tolerated. Users expect apps to be there, responsive, and consistent—no matter what’s happening behind the scenes. That’s why active-active multi-region design is one of the strongest reliability patterns in Azure. You’re not betting everything on a single datacenter. Instead, your app runs in multiple regions at the same time, sharing the load. If one region goes down, the others keep humming with almost no disruption.
This post kicks off Day 1 of our 30-day Azure Well-Architected journey, where we’ll explore what it really takes to build and operate an active-active environment in Azure: the benefits, the trade-offs, and the technical building blocks.
Active-Active vs. Active-Passive
Active-active means all regions are serving production traffic all the time. This contrasts with active-passive (or “warm standby”), where a secondary region is idling or handling minimal load until failover. Active-active maximizes resource utilization and provides immediate failover without waiting for a cold region to spin up. The trade-off is complexity in keeping data in sync and higher cost since you run full capacity in multiple locations. Active-passive might save cost by keeping secondary systems scaled down, but recovery isn’t instantaneous. In Azure, many mission-critical systems favor active-active for the fastest recovery – essentially achieving zero downtime during regional failures.
Key Azure Services for Active-Active
Azure Front Door
Azure Front Door is a global layer-7 reverse proxy and content delivery platform that distributes incoming user traffic across multiple regions. With Front Door, you can configure latency-based routing, ensuring each user is sent to the closest (or fastest responding) regional deployment. If one region goes down, Front Door’s health probes detect the failure and automatically stop routing users there, sending them to the remaining region(s). Failover speed depends on the probe interval and health policy, but typically completes quickly without user intervention.
Azure Traffic Manager
Traffic Manager is a DNS-based global load balancer that can also do geographic or performance-based routing. It directs clients to different service endpoints (in different regions) before the connection is made. In an active-active design, Traffic Manager or Front Door can implement performance routing, choosing the endpoint with the lowest latency for each user.
Database Replication
-
Azure Cosmos DB: A globally distributed NoSQL database that natively supports active-active writes (multi-master). You can enable Cosmos DB in multiple regions, and the app can write to whichever region is local. Cosmos handles propagating those writes and resolving conflicts with a configurable policy. It offers five consistency levels: Strong, Bounded Staleness, Session, Consistent Prefix, and Eventual.
-
Azure SQL Database: For relational workloads, use Auto-failover Groups or Active Geo-Replication. One SQL instance is designated for writes while others can serve read-only traffic. Some applications partition data regionally and replicate asynchronously for scale.
-
Azure Database for PostgreSQL/MySQL: These support read replicas (including cross-region), but do not offer native multi-master. Multi-region writes require third-party or custom solutions.
-
Azure Storage: Geo-redundant storage (GRS) and Geo-zone-redundant storage (GZRS) replicate blobs to a paired secondary region automatically. However, the secondary is not readable by default—you must use RA-GRS or RA-GZRS if you want to query the secondary before failover. For truly active-active blob access, consider Azure CDN/Front Door caching, or manage per-region storage accounts with your own synchronization process.
Design Considerations
Consistent User Experience
When users switch regions (during a failover or when traveling), you want a consistent experience. This often means implementing stateless sessions or replicating session state across regions (e.g., Azure Cache for Redis). Azure Front Door can inject session affinity cookies to keep users pinned to one region for performance, but if that region fails, session context may be lost unless shared across regions.
Data Consistency and Conflict Resolution
Multi-master systems like Cosmos DB can create conflicts (e.g., two users updating the same record in different regions). You must define a conflict resolution strategy: last-write-wins, custom merge logic, or partitioning ownership of data. Azure SQL designs often rely on eventual consistency or sharding patterns.
Latency and Performance
Active-active reduces user latency by connecting to the nearest region. However, some operations (like cross-region replication) still incur latency. Use asynchronous patterns (Service Bus, Event Grid) for cross-region communication where possible.
Capacity Planning
Each region in an active-active model should be able to handle 100% of the production load on its own (2N redundancy). For example, if both regions normally run at 50%, one can absorb 100% if the other fails. Azure autoscaling can help, but you should simulate failovers in staging to confirm resiliency.
Health Monitoring and Failover Automation
Azure Front Door and Traffic Manager rely on health probes to detect issues. Configure probes against meaningful endpoints (like /health) that verify dependencies (database, cache). Failover occurs according to probe interval and policy—typically within seconds to minutes. Pair this with Azure Monitor alerts to catch rising error rates or latency issues.
Benefits and Trade-offs
Active-active yields maximal uptime: your app can tolerate a full Azure region outage with minimal disruption. It also enables rolling upgrades region by region, ensuring continuous service. Serving from nearby regions also improves performance for global users.
The trade-offs are cost and complexity. Running duplicate infrastructure full-time doubles some costs, and cross-region replication adds bandwidth charges. Operations are more complex: monitoring, testing, and automation must be multi-region aware. For some legacy systems, active-passive may be a more pragmatic choice.
Best Practices
-
Deploy in Azure region pairs (e.g., East US ↔ West US) for network affinity and prioritized recovery.
-
Use asynchronous replication for most workloads; reserve synchronous replication for critical data.
-
Configure health probes on global load balancers with meaningful
/healthendpoints. -
Conduct game days and chaos engineering drills to simulate regional outages and validate the design.
-
Consider session design carefully (stateless or distributed) to avoid disruptions when regions shift.
Example Scenario
Consider a multi-player online game that must be live 24/7. Game servers run in East US and West Europe. Azure Front Door routes players to the nearest region using latency-based routing. Player profiles are stored in Cosmos DB with both regions enabled for writes; Cosmos replicates globally with latency depending on region distance and consistency level. Gameplay events are cached in Redis per region, but also queued in geo-redundant Storage Queues to recover if cache data is lost.
During a West Europe outage, Front Door health probes detect failure and route all European players to East US. Latency rises slightly, but gameplay continues. When West Europe recovers, traffic gradually balances again. This demonstrates seamless active-active resiliency.
The Wrap Up
Active-active multi-region architecture is how you achieve 99.99%+ availability in Azure. It’s not cheap, and it’s not simple, but for mission-critical systems it’s essential. By combining services like Front Door, Traffic Manager, Cosmos DB, and SQL failover, you can survive even an entire region outage and keep serving users.
This is the foundation of the Well-Architected Reliability pillar: planning for failure and building to stay online when it happens.
Day 1 down. Day 2 coming up—follow along for the next step in our 30-day Azure Well-Architected Framework journey.
Check out this PDF carousel on it: WAF DAY1